How Politics and Gaming Met Up in 2017: Trump, Immigration Status, and Betting Limits Take Center Stage

When politics met gaming in 2017, the intensity hit from all sides of the fence. And when Donald Trump officially became the 45th President of the United States in January, becoming the first former casino owner ever to hold the office, there was no doubt that politics and gaming would be deeply intertwined all year and likely for his entire term in office.

Given President Trump’s ties to the gaming industry, it was little surprise that many conservative casino owners became early supporters of his bid for the presidency. That included names like Sheldon Adelson and Carl Icahn, but Steve Wynn was a notable exception, as the casino mogul and new finance chair of the Republican National Committee chose not to publicly endorse Trump during the campaign.

In March, . However, his interests in Macau had made him wary of issuing a public endorsement, particularly because of Trump’s repeated criticism of US trade agreements with China.

Another supporter of Trump’s presidential bid had been billionaire and Las Vegas Strip Treasure Island casino owner Phil Ruffin.

In late March, word broke that the Trump Organization, now under the control of sons Eric and Donald Trump Jr., was in discussions to build a new casino resort in Las Vegas next to the Trump International Hotel, which is currently jointly owned by the Trump Organization and Ruffin. The proposal would be to turn what is a paved parking lot into a casino.

But after lots of brouhaha in March, there was nothing further on the status of the project, so we ll have to wait for the other shoe to drop in 2018.

Not every casino owner was happy with Trump’s election, however. In 2017, we saw several executives and corporations in the gaming industry push back against the new administration and more broadly, what they considered to be the rise of alt-right politics.

MGM CEO Jim Murren may have been the most vocal of these critics. Following the “Unite the Right” rally that saw white supremacists march in Charlottesville, Virginia, Murren told workers at his company that to any of seven anti-hate organizations he identified.

The move was certain to ruffle some feathers, as the supported groups included several that are frequently criticized in conservative media, such as the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) and the Southern Poverty Law Center.

Along with Caesars Entertainment, MGM was also among the gaming operators that sharply criticized President Trump’s decision to phase out the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrival (DACA) program.

Both companies have many employees in Nevada that have been allowed to stay in the country because of DACA, which prevented the deportation of children who had been brought to the country illegally.

About 13,000 so-called “Dreamers” live in Nevada, many of whom work in the state’s casinos. Executives from both companies hoped that Congress could work quickly to provide stability so those affected could have certainty as to their future in the United States. A six-month deadline was created, which ended on October 5, likely leaving many casino workers on shaky ground regarding their legal status.

Politics and gaming aren’t just bedfellows in the United States, of course. Over in the UK, one of the hottest topics of the year was the future of fixed-odds betting terminals (FOBTs), the highly profitable machines found in so many betting shops throughout the country.

The controversy over the future of FOBTs came to a head in October, when the Department for Culture, Media, and Sport issued its review of the gaming industry. The review recommended a reduction in the maximum bet allowed on the machines, which currently stands at £100 ($132), to somewhere between £2 ($2.63) and £50 ($66).

This promises to continue to be a major point of contention in 2018, as bookmakers, regulators, and government officials battle over exactly where the new limits should be placed.